SELF IMPROVEMENT

vector marketing corporation Some of Vector Marketing former independent contractors have accused Vector Marketing of unsavory business practices.[10][11] Vector frequently advertises in newspapers and on fliers posted on bulletin boards at college campuses, but seldom do those advertisements explain the nature of the job.[12]

Vector Marketing used to require sales representatives to make a security deposit of approximately $139 in order to procure a set of knives for demonstrations, prompting some to complain about this policy, even when the deposit was refundable if a representative chose to quit or the contract was terminated and the sample kit was returned.[13] [10][11][14] The sample kit must be returned if the representative concludes work with Vector.[15] Students who work for Vector Marketing are considered independent contractors and are not reimbursed by the company for money they spend on gasoline and usual business expenses while working or for the time they spend at training sessions.[7][10] In the 2008 case Vector Marketing Corporation v. New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire ruled that Vector employees are independent contractors and Vector is thus exempt from the state business profit tax.[16]

Vector was sued in 1990 by the Arizona Attorney General and in 1999 by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. In 1994, the state of Wisconsin ordered Vector to stop providing dishonest information to recruits.[17] The state and Vector agreed to a settlement that punctuated a series of state actions against Vector's Tucson manager that spanned seven years. Vector agreed not to misrepresent its compensation system as part of the settlement. As a result, Vector no longer recruits in the US state of Wisconsin. [18]

In 1996, The Washington Post reported that of "940 Vector recruits surveyed, nearly half either earned no money or actually lost money through working with the company." [19] The company's alleged unethical actions created an activist group called Students Against Vector Exploitation (SAVE) [20]

In 2008, Alicia Harris filed a federal class action lawsuit against Vector. Harris alleged that Vector violated California and federal labor law by failing to pay adequate wages and illegally coerced employees into patronizing the company.[21] The case, Harris v. Vector Marketing Corporation, is pending before Judge Edward M. Chen.